Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 12/16/2011

M.R. v. Dreyfus

Citations

  • 663 F.3d 1100
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 24986
  • 2011 WL 6288173

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • articulating preliminary injunction standard in terms of liµelihood of success on the merits or serious questions going to the merits
  • articulating preliminary injunction standard in terms of likelihood of success on the merits or serious questions going to the merits
  • noting Ninth Circuit has “several times held that beneficiaries of public assistance may demonstrate a risk of irreparable injury by showing that enforcement of a proposed rule may deny them needed medical care”
  • “An ADA plaintiff need not show that institutionalization is ‘inevitable’ or that she has ‘no choice’ but to submit to institutional care to state a violation of the integration mandate.”
  • plaintiffs were both mentally and physically disabled

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reinhardt, Fletcher, Rawlinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.