Ninth Circuit· 12/16/2011
M.R. v. Dreyfus
Citations
- 663 F.3d 1100
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 24986
- 2011 WL 6288173
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- articulating preliminary injunction standard in terms of liµelihood of success on the merits or serious questions going to the merits
- articulating preliminary injunction standard in terms of likelihood of success on the merits or serious questions going to the merits
- noting Ninth Circuit has “several times held that beneficiaries of public assistance may demonstrate a risk of irreparable injury by showing that enforcement of a proposed rule may deny them needed medical care”
- “An ADA plaintiff need not show that institutionalization is ‘inevitable’ or that she has ‘no choice’ but to submit to institutional care to state a violation of the integration mandate.”
- plaintiffs were both mentally and physically disabled
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reinhardt, Fletcher, Rawlinson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Henry Pashby v. Albert DeliaFourth Circuit· 2013-03-05· cited 399×
- Samuel Lopez v. Janice BrewerNinth Circuit· 2012-05-15· cited 333×
- M.R. v. DreyfusNinth Circuit· 2011-12-16· cited 180×
- Derek Waskul v. Washtenaw Cnty. Community Mental HealthSixth Circuit· 2020-10-29· cited 106×
- Thorpe v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2012-02-14· cited 31×
- Kenneth R. v. HassanD. New Hampshire· 2013-09-17· cited 30×
- Ball ex rel. Burba v. KasichS.D. Ohio· 2017-03-23· cited 23×
- United States v. State of MississippiFifth Circuit· 2023-09-20· cited 13×
- Brown v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2017-09-13· cited 9×
- Lane v. KitzhaberD. Oregon· 2012-05-17· cited 7×
- Arizona Hospital & Healthcare Ass'n v. BetlachD. Arizona· 2012-03-23· cited 5×
- Hooks v. International Longshore & Warehouse Union, Local 8D. Oregon· 2012-11-21· cited 2×
- ARC of California v. DouglasE.D. California· 2013-07-01· cited 1×
- M. R. v. Susan DreyfusNinth Circuit· 2012-06-18
- Retail Imaging Management Group, LLC v. Fujifilm North America Corp.D. Oregon· 2012-01-30
- Kenneth R. v. State of N H , et al.D. New Hampshire· 2013-09-17
- United States v. State of FloridaEleventh Circuit· 2026-03-31
Cites
41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 20,645×
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court· 2008-11-12· cited 11,986×
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court· 1985-03-19· cited 11,658×
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court· 1983-04-20· cited 5,797×
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court· 1997-02-19· cited 2,686×
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellNinth Circuit· 2011-01-25· cited 2,463×
- United States v. HinksonNinth Circuit· 2009-11-05· cited 2,227×
- Alexander v. ChoateSupreme Court· 1985-01-09· cited 1,271×
- Olmstead v. L.C.Supreme Court· 1999-06-22· cited 721×
- Federal Express Corp. v. HoloweckiSupreme Court· 2008-02-27· cited 716×
- Miller v. FrenchSupreme Court· 2000-06-19· cited 593×
- The Lands Council v. McNairNinth Circuit· 2008-07-02· cited 543×
- Brown v. PlataSupreme Court· 2011-05-23· cited 531×
- Armstrong v. DavisNinth Circuit· 2001-11-28· cited 428×
- Beal v. DoeSupreme Court· 1977-06-20· cited 390×
- Sports Form, Inc., a Nevada Corporation v. United Press International, Inc., a Delaware CorporationNinth Circuit· 1982-08-27· cited 350×
- Schweiker v. HoganSupreme Court· 1982-06-21· cited 262×
- Mario Lopez v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesNinth Circuit· 1983-08-24· cited 221×
- Virginia Zepeda v. United States Immigration And Naturalization ServiceNinth Circuit· 1985-03-26· cited 190×
- Fisher v. Oklahoma Health Care AuthorityTenth Circuit· 2003-07-15· cited 131×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.