· 7/15/2003
Fisher v. Oklahoma Health Care Authority
Citations
- 335 F.3d 1175
- 14 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1005
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 14191
- 2003 WL 21652637
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Olmstead does not require a disabled person to submit to institutionalization when “imperiled with segregation” due to a state policy
- holding that Olmstead does not require a disabled person to submit to institutionalization when “imperiled with segregation” due to a state policy
- party seeking 9 The Magistrate Judge recommended that Plaintiff’s PI Motion be denied. (ECF No. 43.
- state may not amend optional programs so as to violate the ADA
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lucero, Baldock, O'Brien
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.