Alexander v. Choate

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Medicaid \benefits\ under the Rehabilitation Act [and hence ADA] are \the individual services offered\ not the \amorphous objective of 'adequate health care'\
• holding that 14-day limitation on inpatient hospital stays does not deny disabled individuals meaningful access to Medicaid services
• holding that a ceiling on the number of inpatient hospital days paid for by Tennessee's Medicaid program did not deny the disabled meaningful access to Medicaid services
• holding that regardless of previous 20 inpatient days Medicaid funding limitation, present 14 day limitation provided meaningful access
• holding that reduction of inpatient coverage for class of Medicaid recipients did not violate Rehabilitation Act without questioning propriety of class action under Rehabilitation Act
• holding that \adequate health care\ was too \amorphous\ a concept to define the government service or benefit to which disabled persons may assert a statutory right of access and accommodation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).