Virginia Zepeda v. United States Immigration And Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that a court may issue an injunction only “if it has personal jurisdiction over the parties”
• explaining that the scope of an injunction is limited to the parties in the action
• noting that a “court may issue an injunction if it has personal jurisdiction over the parties” but cannot “attempt to 3 determine the rights of persons not before the court”
• stating that “[a] federal court may issue an injunction if it has personal 28 jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter jurisdiction over the claim; it may not attempt to 1 determine the rights of persons not before the court.”
• stating that “[a] federal court may issue an injunction if it has personal jurisdiction over 2 the parties and subject matter jurisdiction over the claim; it may not attempt to determine the 3 rights of persons not before the court.”
• a federal court “may not attempt to 2 determine the rights of persons not before the court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).