Thorpe v. District of Columbia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]here is wide-spread agreement that one essential component of an ‘effectively working’ plan is a measurable commitment to deinstitutionalization.”
• “Consumer claims for a lack of substantiation are not cognizable 3 under California law.”
• To state a claim under the ADA, it is “sufficient to allege . . . that the [government] has utilized criteria or methods of administration that have caused plaintiffs to be confined unnecessarily in nursing facilities.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).