Henry Pashby v. Albert Delia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an integration claim under the ADA is also valid under the Rehabilitation Act
• holding that a claim is only ripe when it involves a formalized administrative decision
• holding that plaintiffs may raise successful ADA and Rehabilitation Act claims “because they face a risk of institutionalization”
• holding that a governmental entity’s change to a challenged policy does not moot an action when the government retains authority to “reassess ... at any time” the change and revert to the challenged policy
• holding that comparability provision allows states to “provide[ ] different coverage to different categorically needy individuals . . . so long as th[at] coverage . . . bears a reasonable relation to the particular needs of the individual”
• concluding a preliminary injunction was appropriate when the plaintiffs had demonstrated a likelihood of success on some, but not all, of their claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).