Fourth Circuit· 3/5/2013

Henry Pashby v. Albert Delia

Citations

709 F.3d 307
2013 WL 791829
2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 4516

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that an integration claim under the ADA is also valid under the Rehabilitation Act
holding that a claim is only ripe when it involves a formalized administrative decision
holding that plaintiffs may raise successful ADA and Rehabilitation Act claims “because they face a risk of institutionalization”
holding that a governmental entity’s change to a challenged policy does not moot an action when the government retains authority to “reassess ... at any time” the change and revert to the challenged policy
holding that comparability provision allows states to “provide[ ] different coverage to different categorically needy individuals . . . so long as th[at] coverage . . . bears a reasonable relation to the particular needs of the individual”
concluding a preliminary injunction was appropriate when the plaintiffs had demonstrated a likelihood of success on some, but not all, of their claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Agee, Wynn, Floyd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

100 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

62 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.