Moyo v. Gomez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that under Title VII it is not necessary that the employment practice actually be unlawful
• noting that the Equal Protection Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) has held that 3 inmates working directly for a prison pursuant to state law requiring prisoners to work at hard labor 4 are not “employee” within 701(f) of Title VII
• finding black prison guard’s belief that inmates were entitled to Title VII protection reasonable
• allowing retaliation claim based on informal protest of allegedly discriminatory policy
• finding black prison guard's belief that inmates were entitled to Title VII protection reasonable
• allowing 14 retaliation claim based on informal protest of allegedly discriminatory policy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

60 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Yanowitz v. L'OREAL USA, INC.
  California Supreme Court· 2005-08-11· cited 838×
• William J. Ray v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General
  Ninth Circuit· 2000-07-07· cited 707×
• Stacie Somers v. Apple, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2013-09-03· cited 397×
• Miller v. Department of Corrections
  California Supreme Court· 2005-07-18· cited 379×
• Freitag v. Ayers
  Ninth Circuit· 2006-09-13· cited 242×
• Nelson Walker, and Fair Housing Foundation of Long Beach, Counter-Claimant-Appellant v. City of Lakewood, a California Municipality
  Ninth Circuit· 2001-11-01· cited 200×
• Maureen Little v. Windermere Relocation, Inc., a Washington Corporation
  Ninth Circuit· 2002-01-23· cited 156×
• Ellis v. City of Seattle
  Washington Supreme Court· 2000-12-14· cited 138×
• Lewis \Toby\ Tyler v. City of Manhattan, United States of America, Amicus Curiae
  Tenth Circuit· 1997-07-08· cited 110×
• Blueford v. Prunty
  Ninth Circuit· 1997-03-06· cited 104×
• Emeldi v. University of Oregon
  Ninth Circuit· 2012-03-21· cited 89×
• Lelaind v. City and County of San Francisco
  N.D. California· 2008-09-02· cited 78×
• Dinslage v. City and County of San Francisco
  California Court of Appeal· 2016-11-09· cited 67×
• Passantino v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Products, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2000-03-10· cited 50×
• Strother v. Southern California Permanente Medical Group
  Ninth Circuit· 1996-03-08· cited 46×
• Ayala v. Frito Lay, Inc.
  E.D. California· 2017-06-30· cited 44×
• Currier v. Northland Services, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2014-08-04· cited 41×
• Castro-Ramirez v. Dependable Highway Express, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2016-08-29· cited 34×
• Maureen Little v. Windermere Relocation, Inc., a Washington Corporation
  Ninth Circuit· 2001-09-12· cited 23×
• Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Nalbandian Sales, Inc.
  E.D. California· 1998-04-20· cited 21×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-19· cited 5,248×
• Dr. N. Jay ROGERS Et Al., Petitioners-Appellees, v. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Respondent-Appellant
  Fifth Circuit· 1972-01-31· cited 409×
• Hale v. Arizona
  Ninth Circuit· 1993-05-04· cited 201×
• Stephen D. Learned v. City of Bellevue
  Ninth Circuit· 1988-11-03· cited 117×
• Jurado v. Eleven-Fifty Corp.
  Ninth Circuit· 1987-04-02· cited 99×
• Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. Craft
  Supreme Court· 1977-02-22· cited 87×
• Joe E. DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VALLEY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
  Ninth Circuit· 1975-09-15· cited 81×
• Leydell Baker v. McNeil Island Corrections Center
  Ninth Circuit· 1988-10-12· cited 75×

Other cases named Moyo v. Gomez

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Moyo v. Gomez
  Ninth Circuit· 1994-08-08· cited 69×