Skip to main content
· 7/7/2000

William J. Ray v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General

Citations

  • 217 F.3d 1234
  • 2000 Daily Journal DAR 7393
  • 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5520
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 15664
  • 78 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,196
  • 83 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 753
  • 2000 WL 897778

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a hostile work environment can also be the basis for a retaliation claim under Title VII
  • holding that “an action is cognizable as an adverse employment action if it is reasonably likely to deter employees from engaging in protected activity”
  • recognizing that a transfer may be an adverse employment action for purposes 17 of a retaliation claim
  • holding that an adverse employment action is one “reasonably likely to deter employees from engaging in protected activity”
  • holding that “an adverse employment action is adverse treatment that is reasonably likely to deter employees from engaging in protected activity”
  • holding that “an adverse employment action is adverse treatment that is reasonably likely to deter employees from engaging in protected activity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alarcon, Fletcher, Hawkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.