Stacie Somers v. Apple, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the allegations must “rise beyond 17 mere conceivability or possibility” to meet the plausibility standard
• stating that 15 the allegations must “rise beyond mere conceivability or possibility” to meet the 16 plausibility standard
• stating that the allegations must “rise beyond 17 mere conceivability or possibility” to meet the plausibility standard
• “We review a district court’s denial of a motion for class certification for abuse of discretion.”
• “A claim is facially plausible ‘when the plaintiff pleads factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged.’ ” (quoting Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 678, 129 S.Ct. 1937)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).