Hawaii Supreme Court· 8/18/1975
Morneau v. Stark Enterprises, Ltd.
Citations
- 539 P.2d 472
- 56 Haw. 420
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding rule of privity or mutuality has been abandoned in the defensive use of collateral estoppel
- collateral estoppel precludes the relitigation of an issue which was decided in a prior suit on a different claim
- “Under Hawaii law, the doctrine of res judicata applies when: 1
- “Under Hawaii law, the doctrine of res judicata applies when: 1
- “this jurisdiction has been classified as one in which the requirement of mutuality has been at least abandoned to permit a stranger to a judgment to rely upon it defensively against a party to such judgment, or a privy to such party[]” (citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kobayashi, Ogata, Menor, Kawakami, Richardson, Kato
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Goodson v. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court· 1983-01-05· cited 316×
- State v. HigaHawaii Supreme Court· 1995-05-17· cited 150×
- Bremer v. WeeksHawaii Supreme Court· 2004-02-17· cited 148×
- In Re: Genesys Data Technologies, IncorporatedFourth Circuit· 2000-02-09· cited 138×
- Pele Defense Fund v. PatyHawaii Supreme Court· 1992-09-28· cited 130×
- Conley v. SpillersWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1983-03-15· cited 129×
- Bush v. WatsonHawaii Supreme Court· 1996-05-24· cited 91×
- Dorrance v. LeeHawaii Supreme Court· 1999-04-27· cited 77×
- Hossler Ex Rel. Dows v. BarrySupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1979-06-26· cited 71×
- Santos v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. KAUAI DIV.Hawaii Supreme Court· 1982-06-22· cited 56×
- Aga v. HundahlHawaii Supreme Court· 1995-03-24· cited 52×
- State v. MagoonHawaii Supreme Court· 1993-09-07· cited 33×
- Sussel v. Civil Service CommissionHawaii Supreme Court· 1993-05-06· cited 33×
- Pedrina v. Han Kuk ChunD. Hawaii· 1995-06-27· cited 33×
- Matter of Herbert M. Dowsett TrustHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1990-05-04· cited 32×
- Silver v. Queen's HospitalHawaii Supreme Court· 1981-06-17· cited 32×
- State v. AlveyHawaii Supreme Court· 1984-02-15· cited 31×
- Rosa v. CWJ Contractors, Ltd.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1983-05-18· cited 31×
- Fuller v. Pacific Medical Collections, Inc.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1995-03-22· cited 31×
- Hall v. StateHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1988-05-26· cited 29×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court· 1971-05-03· cited 2,250×
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court· 1942-03-06· cited 895×
- Bruszewski v. United StatesThird Circuit· 1950-04-11· cited 287×
- Bill J. Gambocz v. Anthony M. YelencsicsThird Circuit· 1972-10-12· cited 186×
- B. R. DeWitt, Inc. v. HallNew York Court of Appeals· 1967-02-21· cited 167×
- Ellis v. CrockettHawaii Supreme Court· 1969-02-25· cited 143×
- Walter B. Graves v. Associated Transport, Inc.Fourth Circuit· 1965-04-07· cited 67×
- Giedrewicz v. DonovanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1931-12-28· cited 53×
- McBRYDE SUGAR COMPANY, LIMITED v. RobinsonHawaii Supreme Court· 1973-01-10· cited 52×
- Greif v. DulleaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1944-11-24· cited 52×
- Tamashiro v. De GamaHawaii Supreme Court· 1969-02-28· cited 48×
- Sanderson v. BalfourSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1968-10-31· cited 30×
- STATE SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION v. CoreyHawaii Supreme Court· 1971-09-09· cited 13×
- Henderson v. PenceHawaii Supreme Court· 1967-11-08· cited 9×
- Adair v. HustaceHawaii Supreme Court· 1974-04-26· cited 4×
- Kekoa ex rel. Enomoto v. Supreme CourtHawaii Supreme Court· 1971-10-01· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.