Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 5/26/1988

Hall v. State

Citations

756 P.2d 1048
7 Haw. App. 274
1988 Haw. App. LEXIS 14

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a deputy attorney general's alleged defamatory statements made in preparation of the defense of his clients were absolutely privileged
holding that a deputy attorney general’s alleged defamatory statements made in preparation of the defense of his clients were absolutely privileged
holding that a deputy attorney general’s alleged defamatory statements made in preparation of the defense of his clients were absolutely privileged
summary judgment is appropriate when party fails to make a sufficient showing
“[Sjince in deciding the Motion To Dismiss, which was entitled alternatively as a motion for summary judgment, matters outside the pleading were considered by the lower court, the court really granted summary judgment under Rule 56, HRCP, and not a dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6
summary-judgment is appropriate when party fails to make a sufficient showing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burns, Heen, Tanaka

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.