Skip to main content
· 2/9/2000

In Re: Genesys Data Technologies, Incorporated

Citations

  • 204 F.3d 124
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 1751

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that under § 1738 a federal court must apply “the rules chosen by the State from which the judgment is taken”
  • noting that “under Hawai'i law, as under federal law, a judgment may be attacked for ‘fraud upon the court’ at any time”
  • explaining that we review the legal conclusions of the bankruptcy court and district court de novo and the factual findings of the bankruptcy court for clear error
  • “When a Complaint demands a specific amount of damages, courts have generally held that a default judgment cannot award additional damages.”
  • “When a Complaint demands a specific amount of damages, courts have generally held that a default judgment cannot award additional damages.”
  • “When a Complaint demands a specific amount of damages, courts have generally held that a default judgment cannot award additional damages.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.