Bremer v. Weeks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “findings of fact that are not challenged on appeal are binding on the appellate court”
• holding that “findings of fact ... that are not challenged on appeal are binding on the appellate court”
• holding that “findings of fact ... that are not challenged on appeal are binding on the appellate court”
• explaining that courts have granted a right of way based on necessity, or based on ancient and historical use
• noting that res judicata and collateral estoppel, respectively, apply when a claim or issue decided in the original suit is identical to one presented in the action in question
• “findings of fact that are not challenged on appeal are binding on the appellate court” (quotation marks, brackets, and ellipsis omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).