Skip to main content
· 5/4/1990

Matter of Herbert M. Dowsett Trust

Citations

  • 791 P.2d 398
  • 7 Haw. App. 640
  • 1990 Haw. App. LEXIS 14

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that dismissal with prejudice based on a stipulated agreement was a final judgment on the merits for claim preclusion purposes
  • privity was not established by mother-child relationship where interests were divergent; mother had an interest in the trust income and children had an interest in the trust corpus
  • settlement dismissing case with prejudice con stitutes final judgment for purposes of claim preclusion under Hawaii law
  • “[R]es judicata comprises two separate doctrines or rules concerning the preclusive effect of prior adjudication. Those doctrines or rules are denominated ‘res judicata’ and ‘collateral estoppel.’”
  • stipulation of dismissal with prejudice constitutes a final judgment on the merits for the purpose of res judicata though not for the purpose of collateral estoppel; all elements of res judicata must be satisfied for doctrine to apply
  • endorsing a functional approach to privity analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burns, Heen, Tanaka

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.