Moraine v. Social Security Administration

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the ALJ failed to explain how normal motor strength and range of motion related in any meaningful way to the claimant’s symptoms of fibromyalgia
• remanding when the ALJ cited claimant’s activities of daily living to discredit her testimony about her disabling symptoms without resolving conflicting evidence that she could not complete those activities without significant support
• “insofar as the Plaintiff seeks a remand based upon a subsequent grant of benefits, standing alone and without any opportunity to consider the basis for that grant, we are unable to find that the grant constitutes new evidence”
• “The Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has held that an ALJ’s erroneous failure, at Step Two, to include an impairment as a severe impairment, will warrant a reversal and remand, even where the ALJ found other impairments to be severe.”
• “The Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has held that an ALJ’s erroneous failure, at Step Two, to include an impairment as a severe impairment, will warrant a reversal and remand, even where the ALJ found other impairments to be severe.”
• “The Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has held that an ALJ’s erroneous failure, at Step Two, to include an impairment as a severe impairment, will warrant a reversal and remand, even where the ALJ found other impairments to be severe.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).