Christi L. Moore v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff’s diagnosis of varus leg instability and shoulder separation did not reveal the extent to which they limited her ability to work
• holding that an RFC determination was supported by a claimant’s “medical history . . . of embellished and magnified pain behaviors and “drug-seeking manipulative tendencies”
• holding that the existence of a “severe” impairment identified at step two of the disability analysis does not reveal the extent to which the impairment inhibits a claimant’s ability to work
• explaining that MacGregor addressed only the requirement that the ALJ articulate reasons for giving less weight to the testimony of a treating physician
• providing that the issue on review is not whether some evidence supports the claim of disability but whether substantial evidence supports the administrative decision
• explaining that mere diagnosis of impairments “does not reveal the extent to which they limit her ability to work or undermine the ALJ’s [RFC] determination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).