Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that reviewing court may not displace agency’s choice between “two fairly conflicting views” of evidence
• holding that reviewing court may not displace agency's choice between \two fairly conflicting views\ of evidence
• holding that “[t]he ‘substantial evidence’ standard is not modified in any way when the Board and its examiner disagree”
• holding that \[t]he `substantial evidence' standard is not modified in any way when the Board and its examiner disagree\
• holding that the nonbinding findings of an NLRB \trial examiner\ may be considered in a subsequent appeal to establish whether an employee's removal was supported by substantial evidence
• holding that the nonbinding findings of an NLRB “trial examiner” may be considered in a subsequent appeal to establish whether an employee’s removal was supported by substantial evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).