William B. Johnson v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the claimant did not lose his job because of his disability, he lost it because his position was eliminated
• finding that when medication treatment improved plaintiff’s mental condition, his disability was undermined
• finding the claimant did not lose his job because of his disability, he lost it because his position was eliminated
• finding the claimant did not lose his job because of his disability, he lost it because his position was eliminated
• finding the -9- claimant did not lose his job because of his disability, he lost it because his position was eliminated
• “‘Acts which are inconsistent with a claimant’s assertion of disability reflect negatively upon that claimant’s credibility.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).