· 9/11/2007
Kirby v. Astrue
Citations
- 500 F.3d 705
- 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 21735
- 2007 WL 2593631
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that absence of formal treatment by a psychiatrist, psychologist, or other mental health professional is a significant consideration when evaluating Plaintiff’s allegations of mental disability
- holding that the ALJ was entitled to discount an opinion where the opinion was based largely on the claimant’s subjective complaints rather than on objective medical evidence
- holding that the ALJ was entitled to discount an opinion where the opinion was based largely on the claimant’s subjective complaints rather than on objective medical evidence
- holding that the ALJ was entitled to discount an opinion where the opinion was based largely on the claimant's subjective complaints rather than on objective medical evidence
- holding that the ALJ was entitled to discount an opinion where the opinion was based largely on the claimant’s subjective complaints rather than on objective medical evidence
- holding that lack of formal treatment by a psychiatrist, psychologist, or other mental health professional is a significant consideration when evaluating Plaintiff's allegations of disability due to a mental impairment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Loken, Arnold, Colloton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.