Nancy KELLEY, Appellant, v. John J. CALLAHAN, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the ALJ’s rejection of the treating physician’s “four-hour [work] day restriction” was “wrong” because “medical opinions on how much work a claimant can do are not only allowed, but encouraged”
• concluding that the ALJ’s rejection of the treating physician’s “four-hour [work] day restriction” was “wrong” because “medical opinions on how much work a claimant can do are not only allowed, but encouraged”
• concluding that the ALJ’s rejection of the treating physician’s “four-hour [work] day restriction” was “wrong” because “medical opinions on how much work a claimant can do are not only allowed, but encouraged”
• noting that there is no evidence that claimant’s muscoskeletal complaints would be affected by smoking cessation
• indicating that one’s ability to work may be based on a lenient employer, a higher tolerance for pain, or no other means of support
• noting that there is no evidence that claimant’s muscoskeletal complaints would be affected by smoking cessation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).