Skip to main content

Moore v. Moore

Citations

  • 734 N.W.2d 285
  • 2007 Minn. App. LEXIS 99
  • 2007 WL 1977146

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “once a final maintenance payment has been made, there is no maintenance obligation to modify”
  • stating that courts and parties often use concepts and language associated with “jurisdiction” imprecisely to refer to nonjurisdictional limits on a court’s authority to address a question
  • noting “that courts and parties often use concepts and language associated with ‘jurisdiction’ imprecisely to refer to, among other things, nonjurisdictional claims-processing rules or nonjurisdictional limits on a court’s authority to address a question”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Peterson, Shumaker, Ross

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.