Supreme Court of Minnesota· 4/5/1974
Eckert v. Eckert
Citations
- 216 N.W.2d 837
- 299 Minn. 120
- 1974 Minn. LEXIS 1423
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that when there is no existing spousal-maintenance obligation and the district court has not reserved “jurisdiction” over spousal maintenance, the district court has no authority to address the issue
- holding court may not renew maintenance after end of original term
- stating “that there cannot be modification of something that has ceased to exist”
- When a trial court terminates the obligation to pay alimony it is without power to reinstate alimony unless that authority is reserved.
- When a trial court terminates the obligation to pay alimony it is without power to reinstate alimony unless that authority is reserved.
- trial courts have statutory power to modify or terminate alimony but cannot reinstate it unless “jurisdiction to thereafter reinstate alimony ... in the matter is reserved”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gordon L. McRae
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Marriage of Karon v. KaronSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-01-30· cited 61×
- Loo v. LooSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1994-08-31· cited 47×
- Waddey v. WaddeyTennessee Supreme Court· 1999-09-07· cited 35×
- In Re the Marriage of CarlsonSupreme Court of Iowa· 1983-09-21· cited 24×
- In re the Marriage of MarshallSupreme Court of Iowa· 1986-10-15· cited 16×
- Mercer v. MercerIdaho Supreme Court· 1982-03-04· cited 12×
- Moore v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2007-07-10· cited 12×
- Santillan v. MartineCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1997-04-08· cited 9×
- Arbuckle v. CiccotelliSupreme Court of Vermont· 2004-07-30· cited 8×
- Marriage of Keating v. KeatingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1989-08-29· cited 7×
- Berens v. BerensCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1989-08-08· cited 6×
- Berger v. BergerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1976-05-21· cited 5×
- Marriage of Diedrich v. DiedrichCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1988-06-21· cited 4×
- Marriage of Plante v. PlanteCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-12-11· cited 3×
- Marriage of Karon v. KaronCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1988-03-25· cited 3×
- Gronland v. GronlandNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2015-10-13· cited 1×
- Virginia Graf Waddey v. Ira Clinton Waddey, Jr.Tennessee Supreme Court· 1999-09-06
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- McClure v. McClureCalifornia Supreme Court· 1935-09-25· cited 77×
- Snyder v. SnyderSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1973-11-23· cited 12×
- McCarthy v. McCarthySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1972-03-31· cited 10×
- Jordan v. JordanIdaho Supreme Court· 1964-07-17· cited 8×
- Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1971-02-19· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.