In re the Marriage of: Shima Shojaee Falavarjani v. Navid Tabrizi

Syllabus

On appeal from judgment dissolving the parties' marriage, appellant argues that the district court should not have (1) omitted respondent's bonuses when calculating income for purposes of child support and maintenance, and (2) treated appellant's \dowry\ of certain gold coins as marital property. Because we discern no error with the determination that respondent's bonuses were not sufficiently dependable periodic payments to include as income, or that the equitable division of marital property included the gold coins, we conclude the district court acted within its discretion and affirm.