· 5/4/2006
Marriage of Rubey v. Vannett
Citations
- 714 N.W.2d 417
- 2006 Minn. LEXIS 276
- 2006 WL 1171857
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “60-day time limit for hearing new trial [or] amended findings motions is a procedural tool and does not divest the district court of jurisdiction”
- reviewing district court’s dismissal of new trial motion as untimely
- discussing jurisdictional and claims-processing rules
- noting same distinction as Eberhart
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Page
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.