Skip to main content
· 5/4/2006

Marriage of Rubey v. Vannett

Citations

  • 714 N.W.2d 417
  • 2006 Minn. LEXIS 276
  • 2006 WL 1171857

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “60-day time limit for hearing new trial [or] amended findings motions is a procedural tool and does not divest the district court of jurisdiction”
  • reviewing district court’s dismissal of new trial motion as untimely
  • discussing jurisdictional and claims-processing rules
  • noting same distinction as Eberhart

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Page

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.