Skip to main content
· 1/15/2016

National Security Counselors v. Central Intelligence Agency

Citations

  • 421 U.S. App. D.C. 22
  • 811 F.3d 22
  • 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 632
  • 2016 WL 191904

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that FOIA requires “a prevailing plaintiff to show that it is both eligible for and entitled to fees”
  • finding that a state's tax foreclosure protections 23 must compare favorably to the mortgage foreclosure protections in BFP in 4 1 order to receive a presumption of “reasonably equivalent value”
  • loss causation sufficiently pled when share price fell 22% and never recovered
  • “[T]here is an attorney-client relationship between in-house counsel and a corporation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tatel, Pillard, Edwards

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.