· 1/15/2016
National Security Counselors v. Central Intelligence Agency
Citations
- 421 U.S. App. D.C. 22
- 811 F.3d 22
- 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 632
- 2016 WL 191904
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that FOIA requires “a prevailing plaintiff to show that it is both eligible for and entitled to fees”
- finding that a state's tax foreclosure protections 23 must compare favorably to the mortgage foreclosure protections in BFP in 4 1 order to receive a presumption of “reasonably equivalent value”
- loss causation sufficiently pled when share price fell 22% and never recovered
- “[T]here is an attorney-client relationship between in-house counsel and a corporation.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tatel, Pillard, Edwards
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.