D.C. Circuit· 3/18/2011
Mohamad v. Rajoub
Citations
- 634 F.3d 604
- 394 U.S. App. D.C. 277
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 5656
- 2011 WL 922158
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that appellant had no cause of action for violation of customary international law pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331
- holding that appellant had no cause of action for violation of customary international law pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331
- “allegations are meritorious if they contain even a hint of a suggestion which, proven at trial, would constitute a complete defense”
- “the same word[s] appearing in different portions of a single provision or act [are] taken to have the same meaning in each appearance” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
- “Congress used the word ‘individual’ to denote only natural per- sons”
- “Congress used the word ‘individual’ to denote only natural persons”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ginsburg, Tatel, Garland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Mohamad v. Palestinian AuthoritySupreme Court· 2012-04-18· cited 390×
- Aziz v. Alcolac, Inc.Fourth Circuit· 2011-09-19· cited 322×
- Sikhs for Justice v. NathS.D. New York· 2012-09-21· cited 267×
- Arkan Ali v. Donald RumsfeldD.C. Circuit· 2011-06-21· cited 172×
- Doe v. Exxon Mobil Corp.D.C. Circuit· 2011-07-08· cited 108×
- National Ass'n of Clean Water Agencies v. Environmental Protection AgencyD.C. Circuit· 2013-08-20· cited 33×
- Michael Friedman v. Kathleen SebeliusD.C. Circuit· 2012-07-27· cited 25×
- Flanagan v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict of Columbia· 2016-06-03· cited 22×
- Alexander Khochinsky v. Republic of PolandD.C. Circuit· 2021-06-18· cited 21×
- S.K. Innovation, Inc. v. FinpolDistrict of Columbia· 2012-04-16· cited 13×
- Dobyns v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2014-09-16· cited 12×
- Garcia v. SebeliusDistrict of Columbia· 2012-06-13· cited 11×
- Void-El v. O'BrienDistrict of Columbia· 2011-09-12· cited 11×
- Hardy v. Joseph I. Sussman, P.C.District of Columbia· 2013-07-12· cited 8×
- Gray v. StaleyDistrict of Columbia· 2015-08-10· cited 8×
- Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc. v. Lamith Designs, Inc.District of Columbia· 2011-06-21· cited 6×
- Service Employees International Union National Industry Pension Fund v. Bristol Manor Healthcare Center, Inc.District of Columbia· 2014-10-29· cited 5×
- Telzrow v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2016-05-26· cited 5×
- Service Employees International Union National Industry Pension Fund v. Hamilton Park Health Care Center, Ltd.District of Columbia· 2014-06-06· cited 4×
- Barros v. Government Employees InsuranceDistrict of Columbia· 2015-02-02· cited 3×
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court· 1938-04-25· cited 18,491×
- Sosa v. Alvarez-MachainSupreme Court· 2004-06-29· cited 1,133×
- Clinton v. City of New YorkSupreme Court· 1998-06-25· cited 641×
- Rochon, Donald v. Gonzales, AlbertoD.C. Circuit· 2006-02-28· cited 611×
- David Nathaniel Jackson v. Malcolm Beech David Nathaniel Jackson v. Malcolm BeechD.C. Circuit· 1980-12-19· cited 609×
- Sinaltrainal v. Coca-Cola CompanyEleventh Circuit· 2009-08-11· cited 452×
- Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.Second Circuit· 2010-09-17· cited 417×
- Commissioner v. LundySupreme Court· 1996-01-17· cited 364×
- John C. Keegel v. Key West & Caribbean Trading Company, Inc.D.C. Circuit· 1980-05-02· cited 302×
- Serra v. LappinNinth Circuit· 2010-04-09· cited 223×
- Romero v. Drummond Co., Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 2008-12-22· cited 215×
- Asgrow Seed Co. v. WinterboerSupreme Court· 1995-01-18· cited 196×
- Meijer, Inc. v. Biovail Corp.D.C. Circuit· 2008-07-25· cited 83×
- United States v. Nicholas MiddletonNinth Circuit· 2000-11-16· cited 51×
- Bowoto v. Chevron Corp.Ninth Circuit· 2010-09-10· cited 45×
- Sitka Sound Seafoods, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardD.C. Circuit· 2000-03-28· cited 37×
- In Re Oliver L. North (Gadd Fee Application)D.C. Circuit· 1994-01-07· cited 34×
- Bismullah v. GatesD.C. Circuit· 2009-01-09· cited 21×
- Sinaltrainal v. Coca-Cola Co.S.D. Florida· 2003-03-28· cited 17×
- Mohamad v. RajoubDistrict of Columbia· 2009-09-30· cited 5×
Other cases named Mohamad v. Rajoub
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.