Skip to main content
D.C. Circuit· 3/18/2011

Mohamad v. Rajoub

Citations

  • 634 F.3d 604
  • 394 U.S. App. D.C. 277
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 5656
  • 2011 WL 922158

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that appellant had no cause of action for violation of customary international law pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331
  • holding that appellant had no cause of action for violation of customary international law pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331
  • “allegations are meritorious if they contain even a hint of a suggestion which, proven at trial, would constitute a complete defense”
  • “the same word[s] appearing in different portions of a single provision or act [are] taken to have the same meaning in each appearance” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
  • “Congress used the word ‘individual’ to denote only natural per- sons”
  • “Congress used the word ‘individual’ to denote only natural persons”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ginsburg, Tatel, Garland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Mohamad v. Rajoub

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.