Skip to main content
· 6/7/2002

Hildebrandt v. State

Citations

  • 770 N.E.2d 355
  • 2002 Ind. App. LEXIS 897
  • 2002 WL 1264144

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that a sentence may be administratively reduced for good behavior by correctional authorities
  • holding that a single aggravating factor may be used to enhance a defendant’s sentence
  • finding this aggravator to be inappropriate in imposing consecutive sentences where the trial court failed to explain why the harm suffered by the victim was in excess of that associated with the offense
  • discussing the difference between a determinate sentence and an indeterminate sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mathias

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.