Indiana Supreme Court· 12/31/1997

Stevens v. State

Citations

691 N.E.2d 412
1997 Ind. LEXIS 242
1997 WL 797724

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that aggravator for killing police officer “required ‘actual knowledge’ on the part of the defendant, rather than the lesser ‘should have known’ standard”
refusing to find that a threat to disclose molestation would “understandably” provoke “an ordinary twenty-year-old man” to rage or terror
refusing to find that a threat to disclose molestation would “understandably” provoke “an ordinary twenty-year-old man” to rage or terror
refusing to find that a threat to disclose molestation would “understandably” provoke “an ordinary twenty-year-old man” to rage or terror
requiring litigants to present “separate legal analysis” of Indiana Constitutional issues to avoid waiver
it must be so prejudicial to the rights of a defendant as to make a fair trial impossible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Selby, Boehm

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

87 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.