Skip to main content

Griffin v. State

Citations

  • 754 N.E.2d 899
  • 2001 Ind. LEXIS 814
  • 2001 WL 1021353

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the fact that one juror says that the alternate's input affected her decision is not part of the analysis governing the request for a new trial
  • stating that the fact that one juror says that the alternate's input affected her decision is not part of the analysis governing the request for a new trial
  • no error in excluding testimony by witness not present at scene and for sole purpose of gaining admission of hearsay evidence from statement made to attorney
  • no error in excluding testimony by witness not present at scene and for sole purpose of gaining admission of hearsay evidence from statement made to attorney
  • juror misconduct does not warrant reversal if State rebuts presumption of prejudice stemming from unauthorized out-of-court communication
  • defense witness called solely for impeachment where he did not witness any of the relevant events, did not provide any substantive testimony, and the defense’s actions indicated a singular intent to impeach

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Boehm, Rucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.