Indiana Supreme Court· 1/25/2001

Stephenson v. State

Citations

742 N.E.2d 463
2001 Ind. LEXIS 47
2001 WL 64874

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that trial court’s exclusion of evidence regarding witness’s seventeen-year-old robbery conviction pursuant to Evidence Rule 609(b
observing that there was no evidence that the juror was exposed to outside influences, including \researching on the Internet\
holding that inconsistencies in the testimony of two or more witnesses go to the weight of the evidence and credibility of the testimony of each individual witness, and such inconsistencies do not make the evidence “incredible” as a matter of law
observing that there was no evidence that the juror was exposed to outside influences, including “researching on the Internet”
noting that if prosecutor makes improper statements shifting burden of proof, the error is cured with a proper advisement made by the trial court
holding any misconduct was de minimus and overcome by the admonishment and preliminary and final instructions stating that the State bore the burden of proof

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sullivan, Shepard, Dickson, Boehm, Rucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

98 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

120 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.