Court of Appeals of Maryland· 8/31/1993
Clark v. State
Citations
- 629 A.2d 1239
- 332 Md. 77
- 1993 Md. LEXIS 135
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Generally, ‘opening the door’ is simply a contention that competent evidence which was previously irrelevant is now relevant through the opponent’s admission of other evidence on the same issue.”
- “The ‘opening the door' doctrine is really a rule of expanded relevancy and authorizes admitting evidence which otherwise would have been irrelevant in order to respond to (1) admissible evidence which generates an issue, or (2
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chasanow
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Conyers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-05-08· cited 89×
- Ayers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-07-21· cited 72×
- State v. HarroldNebraska Supreme Court· 1999-05-07· cited 70×
- State of Tennessee v. Nelson Aguilar Gomez and Florinda LopezTennessee Supreme Court· 2012-04-24· cited 63×
- Terry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-10-01· cited 53×
- State v. LessleyNebraska Supreme Court· 1999-10-15· cited 50×
- Mitchell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2009-04-16· cited 47×
- Grier v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-09-23· cited 46×
- Martin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-07-09· cited 44×
- Braxton v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-11-06· cited 43×
- Elliott v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 2004-03-05· cited 39×
- United States v. SouthwickCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2000-08-30· cited 28×
- State v. Lavoie.Hawaii Supreme Court· 2019-11-22· cited 22×
- McCray v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-08-26· cited 20×
- State v. SapienMissouri Court of Appeals· 2011-02-22· cited 16×
- Sivells v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-12-02· cited 15×
- Coffey v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1994-06-07· cited 14×
- Lockhart v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1994-04-26· cited 14×
- Jensen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-08-31· cited 13×
- Little v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-08-22· cited 13×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ross v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-01-12· cited 201×
- United States v. Frank W. WinstonD.C. Circuit· 1971-06-30· cited 94×
- Rainville v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-11-06· cited 55×
- Straughn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1983-10-07· cited 53×
- Guesfeird v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-08-24· cited 53×
- Kosmas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-07-25· cited 51×
- California Insurance Company v. A. L. Allen and Dovie Moore AllenFifth Circuit· 1956-06-30· cited 47×
- State v. WernerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1985-04-04· cited 34×
- Washington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1982-05-27· cited 30×
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1982-12-08· cited 15×
- Walkup v. PrattCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1820-06-15· cited 11×
- Arbaugh v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-07-28· cited 7×
- Savoy v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1985-07-10· cited 7×
- Lake Roland Elevated Ry. Co. v. WeirCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1897-06-23· cited 7×
- Hall v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1976-06-10· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.