McFadden and Miles v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding non-neutral CSI-effect voir dire question deprived defendant of right to fair and impartial jury
• “The State’s reliance on Gilchrist ... is misplaced, as appellants’ claim of error does not lie upon the inclusion or exclusion of a prospective juror.”
• trial counsel objecting to the CSI voir dire question during voir dire on 21 October 2008
• CSI voir dire question improperly given
• CSI voir dire question improperly given

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).