E.D. Texas· 12/15/1998
Mitchell v. Champs Sports
Citations
- 42 F. Supp. 2d 642
- 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21518
- 1998 WL 1018652
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “While one need not be absolutely destitute to qualify for [IFP] status, such benefit is allowed only when a movant cannot give such costs and remain able to provide for herself and her dependents.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Heartfield, Hines
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 38,518×
- Paul W. Douglass v. United Services Automobile AssociationFifth Circuit· 1996-03-28· cited 8,052×
- Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of AlaskaSecond Circuit· 1982-03-29· cited 4,631×
- Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court· 1948-12-20· cited 3,220×
- United States v. WagnerFifth Circuit· 1998-10-26· cited 463×
- Benito RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeFifth Circuit· 1988-10-14· cited 441×
- Gemeral Earnest Berry, Jr. v. Cigna/rsi-CignaFifth Circuit· 1992-10-29· cited 418×
- William Hamilton Gartrell v. R.S. GaylorFifth Circuit· 1993-01-21· cited 271×
- Willie Bea Grimes v. Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation Richmond State SchoolFifth Circuit· 1996-12-13· cited 248×
- Dao v. Auchan HypermarketFifth Circuit· 1996-10-03· cited 195×
- Joe Nathan Price v. Digital Equipment CorporationFifth Circuit· 1988-06-15· cited 194×
- Walter SESSIONS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RUSK STATE HOSPITAL, Defendant-AppelleeFifth Circuit· 1981-06-26· cited 193×
- Leroy H. Johnson, Jr. v. Alex Rodriguez, Etc.First Circuit· 1991-10-09· cited 188×
- Nancy S. Bradshaw, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated v. Zoological Society of San DiegoNinth Circuit· 1981-12-07· cited 182×
- Richard G. ESPINOZA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD CO., Defendant-AppelleeFifth Circuit· 1985-03-11· cited 155×
- Cleveland Hicks, Jr. v. Jack M. Garner, Etc.Fifth Circuit· 1995-11-03· cited 141×
- Patrick Neal Nerren v. Livingston Police Department Billy Ray Nelson, Sheriff and Bob Key, and Matthew Parrish, and Robert AlstonFifth Circuit· 1996-07-02· cited 139×
- Fulton CASTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY, HATTIESBURG, MISSISSIPPI, Defendant-AppelleeFifth Circuit· 1977-08-05· cited 120×
- Albert R. Gonzalez v. Paul N. Carlin, Postmaster General, and United States Postal ServiceFifth Circuit· 1990-08-07· cited 69×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.