Skip to main content
· 3/11/1985

Richard G. ESPINOZA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD CO., Defendant-Appellee

Citations

  • 754 F.2d 1247
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 28314
  • 36 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 35,062
  • 37 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 415

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “On a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim . . . the district court must accept the truth of plaintiff's allegations or rely upon only those matters outside of the pleadings with respect to which there is no genuine issue of fact.”
  • noting equitable tolling applies to 90-day period

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rubin, Randall, Tate

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.