Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of Alaska

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that even “a liberal interpretation” of a complaint “may not supply essential elements of the claim that were not initially pled.”
• holding that “[v]ague and conclusory allegations of official participation in civil 22 rights violations are not sufficient to withstand a motion to dismiss”
• concluding that vague and conclusory allegations 19 concerning the involvement of supervisory personnel in civil rights violations are not sufficient to 20 support a claim
• holding that vague and conclusory allegations of official participation in civil rights violations in § 1983 claim insufficient to withstand motion to dismiss
• holding that vague and conclusory allegations do not suffice to withstand a 11 motion to dismiss
• holding that a liberal interpretation of a civil rights complaint may not 20 supply essential elements of the claim that were not initially pled

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).