· 7/2/1996
Patrick Neal Nerren v. Livingston Police Department Billy Ray Nelson, Sheriff and Bob Key, and Matthew Parrish, and Robert Alston
Citations
- 86 F.3d 469
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 16055
- 1996 WL 330177
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- inferring that law enforcement knew of risk from combination of potential trauma, complaints of pain, and abrasions
- holding that pro se pleadings should be liberally construed
- noting that the court liberally construes the briefing of pro se litigants
- finding deliberate indifference because officers “turned a deaf ear” to an inmate’s requests for medical attention
- cases following Valencia and applying Eighth Amendment standards to excessive force claims of arrestees and pretrial detainees
- “[W]e make explicit that which was heretofore either implicit or taken for granted in our case law: An arrestee's complaint for denial of substantive due process and a pretrial detainee's complaint for denial of substantive due process are evaluated under the same standards.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Higginbotham, Wiener, Parker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.