Skip to main content
· 7/2/1996

Patrick Neal Nerren v. Livingston Police Department Billy Ray Nelson, Sheriff and Bob Key, and Matthew Parrish, and Robert Alston

Citations

  • 86 F.3d 469
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 16055
  • 1996 WL 330177

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • inferring that law enforcement knew of risk from combination of potential trauma, complaints of pain, and abrasions
  • holding that pro se pleadings should be liberally construed
  • noting that the court liberally construes the briefing of pro se litigants
  • finding deliberate indifference because officers “turned a deaf ear” to an inmate’s requests for medical attention
  • cases following Valencia and applying Eighth Amendment standards to excessive force claims of arrestees and pretrial detainees
  • “[W]e make explicit that which was heretofore either implicit or taken for granted in our case law: An arrestee's complaint for denial of substantive due process and a pretrial detainee's complaint for denial of substantive due process are evaluated under the same standards.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Higginbotham, Wiener, Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.