Benito RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a district court that reviewed a magistrate judge’s report despite a late-filed objection did so at “its discretion”
• confirming the district court’s discretion to consider late-filed objections to a report and recommendation
• “[A] party is not entitled to de novo review ofa magistrate’s finding and recommendations if objections are not raised in writing by the aggrieved party ... after being served with a copy of the magistrate’s report.”
• “[A] party is not entitled to de novo review of a magistrate’s finding and recommendations if objections are not raised in writing by the aggrieved party ... after being served with a copy of the magistrate’s report.”
• “[A] party is not entitled to de novo review of a magistrate’s finding and recommendations if objections are not raised in writing by the aggrieved party ... after being served with a copy of the magistrate’s report.”
• “[A] party is not entitled to de novo review of a magistrate's finding and recommendations if objections are not raised in writing by the aggrieved party ... after being served with a copy of the magistrate's report.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).