Skip to main content
E.D. Illinois· 4/20/2018

Minger v. Berryhill

Citations

  • 307 F. Supp. 3d 865

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that 28 the boilerplate suggests a “more rigorous” standard than the regulation
  • finding that the plaintiff’s daily activities did not “display a routine compatible with maintaining a schedule required of work” and that there was “not even a thread of logic [ ], let alone a bridge” in the ALJ’s discussion otherwise
  • stating that the “not entirely consistent” language was “yet another example of the continuous, confusing and meaningless boilerplate that is all too common in these decisions and that stubbornly persists in spite of the efforts of the Court of Appeals”
  • finding claimant’s statements “not entirely consistent” with other evidence is a more rigorous standard than called for in 20 C.F.R. § 404.1529
  • expressing concern that the same boilerplate language may indicate the ALJ was applying the wrong evidentiary standard
  • expressing concern that the same boilerplate language may indicate the ALJ was applying the wrong evidentiary standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cole

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.