Latesha Moon v. Carolyn Colvin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an ALJ errs by relying on neural imaging to discount a claimant's credibility with respect to chronic migraines
• holding that the ALJ erred by relying on an MRI as evidence of the severity of migraines when no medical provider made such a connection in the plaintiff’s medical record
• indicating that “ALJs are required to rely on expert opinions instead of determining the significance of particular medical findings themselves”
• noting that imagining is generally useful only to rule out certain possible causes of migraines
• noting that ALJs must “rely on expert opinions instead of determining the significance of particular medical findings themselves”
• noting that ALJs must “rely on expert opinions instead of determining the significance of particular medical findings themselves”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).