Karen Murphy v. Carolyn Colvin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the ALJ erred by relying on “statements that characterize [the plaintiff] as medically improving and ‘neurologically stable’”
• holding that an ALJ’s symptom evaluation will not be disturbed if it is based on specific findings and evidence and not “patently wrong”
• holding that \the ALJ's credibility determination is not supported by substantial evidence\ because, among other reasons, \the ALJ did not ask important questions to determine if [the claimant's lack of treatment and noncompliance with treatment] were justifiable\
• holding that \the ALJ's credibility determination is not supported by substantial evidence\ because, among other reasons, \the ALJ did not ask important questions to determine if [the claimant's lack of treatment and noncompliance with treatment] were justifiable\
• concluding that the ALJ erred in finding the claimant’s report of subjective symptoms not credible because she did not complete physical therapy, where the ALJ did not question the claimant about the reasons for not attending all sessions
• clarifying that the ALJ’s use of the template language is not reversible error when it is accompanied by an adequate explanation of the ALJ’s credibility finding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).