Kip Yurt v. Carolyn Colvin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a limitation to unskilled work did not sufficiently account for the claimant’s concentration problems stemming from depression and a psychotic disorder
• holding that an RFC assessment must include any limitations on concentration, persistence, and pace
• explaining that the Seventh Circuit has “repeatedly forbidden” ALJs from cherry-picking only the medical evidence that supports their conclusions.”
• explaining that the Seventh Circuit has “repeatedly forbidden” ALJs from cherry-picking only the medical evidence that supports their conclusions.”
• holding in general RFC assessments “must incorporate all of the claimant’s limitations supported by the medical record.”
• stating that “[a]s a general rule, . . . the ALJ's RFC assessment must incorporate all of the Plaintiff's limitations supported by the medical record.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).