Federal Claims· 1/12/2009
Buser v. United States
Citations
- 85 Fed. Cl. 248
- 2009 U.S. Claims LEXIS 4
- 103 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 497
- 2009 WL 105626
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “ ‘[T]he court is not bound by other decisions in the Court of Federal Claims[.]’”
- “It is ‘undisputed’ that the Court of Federal Claims possesses the authority to adjudicate tax refund claims.”
- “It is ‘undisputed’ that the Court of Federal Claims possesses the authority to adjudicate tax refund claims.”
- “It is ‘undisputed’ that the Court of Federal Claims possesses the authority to adjudicate tax refund claims.”
- “It is ‘undisputed’ that the Court of Federal Claims possesses the authority to adjudicate tax refund claims.”
- “It is ‘undisputed’ that the Court of Federal Claims possesses the authority to adjudicate tax refund claims.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sweeney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Larson v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2009-09-11· cited 17×
- Waltner v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2011-04-22· cited 17×
- Martti v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2015-05-05· cited 9×
- Albemarle Corporation & Subsidiaries v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2014-10-20· cited 6×
- Jackson v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2011-08-22· cited 6×
- Etchegoinberry v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2013-09-30· cited 6×
- Schroerlucke v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2011-09-21· cited 4×
- Martin v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2012-01-13· cited 4×
- Free-Pacheco v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2014-07-16· cited 3×
- Octo Consulting Group, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2014-08-13· cited 3×
- Adams v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2011-06-30· cited 3×
- Estate of Smith v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2012-02-13· cited 2×
- Kettle v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2012-04-18· cited 2×
- Langley v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2016-08-01
- Sullivan v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2016-10-21
- Anoruo v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2018-01-29
- Meissner v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2018-03-08
- Wall v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2019-01-07
- Rochlis v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2020-01-14
- Peretz v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2020-05-31
Cites
92 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court· 1972-02-22· cited 26,103×
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court· 1982-06-24· cited 22,846×
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court· 1974-04-17· cited 13,385×
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court· 2002-02-26· cited 8,748×
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court· 1979-01-09· cited 4,229×
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court· 1946-04-01· cited 4,157×
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court· 1936-05-18· cited 4,144×
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court· 1976-05-03· cited 3,918×
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court· 1941-03-31· cited 3,675×
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court· 1981-06-15· cited 2,470×
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceFederal Circuit· 1988-05-16· cited 1,960×
- Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court· 1976-06-01· cited 1,934×
- United States v. KingSupreme Court· 1969-05-19· cited 1,604×
- Fisher v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2005-03-09· cited 1,462×
- Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court· 1988-06-29· cited 1,281×
- Donald A. Henke v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 1995-07-12· cited 1,186×
- United States v. DalmSupreme Court· 1990-03-21· cited 899×
- Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-03-21· cited 797×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.