Skip to main content
· 5/5/2010

Beldon v. State

Citations

  • 926 N.E.2d 480
  • 2010 Ind. LEXIS 310
  • 2010 WL 1790456

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant’s conviction for felony OWI, which was elevated to a felony due to a prior OWI conviction, could be further enhanced under the habitual substance offender statute because that statute included the requisite explicit legislative direction
  • holding that defendant’s conviction for felony OWI, which was elevated to a felony due to a prior OWI conviction, could be further enhanced under the habitual substance offender statute because that statute included the requisite explicit legislative direction
  • “In Mills, the initial charge had been elevated using a progressive penalty statute.” (citation omitted)
  • “In Mills, the initial charge had been elevated using a progressive penalty statute.” (citation omitted)
  • one meaning of the requirement that the prior felonies be “unrelated” for habitual offender purposes is that the predicate felony is not part of the res gestae of the principal offense
  • one meaning of the requirement that the prior felonies be \unrelated\ for habitual offender purposes is that the predicate felony is not part of the res gestae of the principal offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sullivan, Shepard, Dickson, Boehm, Rucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.