Skip to main content
· 10/18/2012

John A. Dugan v. State of Indiana

Citations

  • 976 N.E.2d 1248
  • 2012 WL 4944308
  • 2012 Ind. App. LEXIS 526

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he statutory motion to correct erroneous sentence is not the appropriate procedural mechanism to challenge an habitual offender enhancement when a conviction underlying the enhancement is subsequently vacated.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barnes, Vaidik, Mathias

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.