D.C. Circuit· 1/4/2018
Mills v. Hayden
Citations
- 284 F. Supp. 3d 14
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that decision letter did not trigger limitations period when letter failed to inform plaintiff of 90-day limit for filing a civil action
- holding that agency decision letter did not trigger ninety-day limitations period when letter failed to inform plaintiff of that time limit
- checking appropriate box for type of discrimination was sufficient to exhaust claim without narrative description
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boasberg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court· 1986-07-01· cited 9,423×
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court· 2006-05-15· cited 2,657×
- Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court· 1976-06-01· cited 1,934×
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier ChurchD.C. Circuit· 1997-07-18· cited 1,499×
- Sparrow, Victor H. v. United Airlines IncD.C. Circuit· 2000-06-27· cited 1,335×
- Jerome Stevens Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Food & Drug AdministrationD.C. Circuit· 2005-04-08· cited 1,308×
- Trudeau v. Federal Trade CommissionD.C. Circuit· 2006-07-28· cited 1,112×
- Frank A. Schuler, Jr. v. United States of America, Department of StateD.C. Circuit· 1979-09-07· cited 925×
- Grand Lodge of the Fraternal Order of Police v. AshcroftDistrict of Columbia· 2001-08-14· cited 854×
- Soon Y. Park v. Howard UniversityD.C. Circuit· 1996-02-12· cited 558×
- Joseph Arpaio v. Barack ObamaD.C. Circuit· 2015-08-14· cited 514×
- Espinoza v. Farah Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court· 1973-11-19· cited 467×
- Banneker Ventures, LLC v. Jim GrahamD.C. Circuit· 2015-08-18· cited 400×
- Woodruff, Phillip v. Peters, MaryD.C. Circuit· 2007-04-06· cited 393×
- Ward v. D.C. Department of Youth Rehabilitation ServicesDistrict of Columbia· 2011-03-07· cited 238×
- Venetian Casino Resort, L.L.C. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionD.C. Circuit· 2005-05-27· cited 115×
- Amirmotazedi v. Viacom, Inc.District of Columbia· 2011-03-09· cited 101×
- Wiley v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia· 2006-07-06· cited 67×
Other cases named Mills v. Hayden
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.