Ward v. D.C. Department of Youth Rehabilitation Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that courts may consider such documents even if they are not produced “by the plaintiff in the complaint but by the defendant in a motion to dismiss”
• explaining that courts may consider such documents even if they are not produced “by the plaintiff in the complaint but by the defendant in a motion to dismiss”
• explaining that courts may consider such documents even if they are not produced “by the plaintiff in the complaint but by the defendant in a motion to dismiss”
• noting that the complaint “necessarily relies upon the fact of the charge and the letter [of determination] in pleading that administrative proceedings were pursued before this action was begun”
• finding that a court may consider “documents upon which the plaintiff's complaint necessarily relies even if the document is produced not by the plaintiff in the complaint but by the defendant in a motion to dismiss” without converting to summary judgment
• finding that a court may consider “documents upon which the plaintiff’s complaint necessarily relies even if the document is produced not by the plaintiff in the complaint but by the defendant in a motion to dismiss” without converting to summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).