Skip to main content

Milligan v. State

Citations

  • 116 A.3d 1232
  • 2015 Del. LEXIS 279
  • 2015 WL 3622880

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “the phlebotomist is not a required chain of custody witness for the introduction of blood results in a DUI trial, and is not needed to ‘show the authenticity of the sample, or the accuracy of the testing device’”
  • discussing the requirements to establish a chain of custody under Delaware and federal law, and observing that the U.S. Supreme Court held in Melendez- Diaz v. Massachusetts, 557 U.S. 305, 129 S.C. 2527, 174 L.Ed.2d 314 (2009

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holland, Valihura, Vaughn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.