Skip to main content

Martin v. State

Citations

  • 60 A.3d 1100
  • 2013 WL 427287
  • 2013 Del. LEXIS 53

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that, in Williams, “five U.S. Supreme Court Justices, in concurrence and dissent, found that the underlying [Cellmark] report was admitted for the truth of the matter asserted”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Berger, Holland, Jacobs, Ridgely, Steele

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.