Court of Appeals of Alaska· 4/23/2010
Vann v. State
Citations
- 229 P.3d 197
- 2010 Alas. App. LEXIS 43
- 2010 WL 1635834
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding no violation where the lab technician testified as to all five samples but only tested three because she interpreted the data from other samples, and the conclusions were her own
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coats, Mannheimer, Bolger
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Cuesta-Rodriguez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2010-10-12· cited 101×
- State v. LopezSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2012-06-22· cited 34×
- State v. ManionCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-02-19· cited 33×
- Derr v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-09-29· cited 24×
- Milligan v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2015-06-10· cited 22×
- State v. GomezArizona Supreme Court· 2010-12-22· cited 15×
- People v. NelsonAppellate Court of Illinois· 2013-07-12· cited 13×
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2012-11-23· cited 13×
- Borchgrevink v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2010-09-17· cited 10×
- State v. RehmannNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2011-04-29· cited 10×
- State v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2015-12-18· cited 3×
- Adams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2017-02-17· cited 3×
- Clayton Phillip Allison v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2019-07-26· cited 1×
- Earl Dean Robbins v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2019-08-23
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.