Skip to main content

Brown v. State

Citations

  • 117 A.3d 568
  • 2015 Del. LEXIS 296
  • 2015 WL 3776933

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the Superior Court correctly held that there was “no rational probability that [defendant] was convicted on false premises”
  • explaining that, “the slight discrepancy among the measurements reported by the police (21.2 grams), OCME (23.23 grams), and NMS (22.05 grams) would not have changed the result, and there was thus no prejudice to Brown.”
  • “We review trial court rulings on the admissibility of evidence for abuse of discretion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Strine, Holland, Valihura

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.